Home » Film » Anonymous Film Review: Was a Shakespeare a Fraud?

Anonymous Film Review: Was a Shakespeare a Fraud?

Anonymous Film Review: Was a Shakespeare a Fraud?

Was Shakespeare a Fraud? Anonymous Film Review

Being a bit of an English nerd, I was quite excited to hear that there was a film coming out about a conspiracy story surrounding one of the greatest writers of all time, William Shakespeare. Not to mention, that every time I went shopping at Westfield, which was an awful lot, I saw the trailer being played repeatedly on the massive screen they have set up outside the shopping centre. I was slightly dissuaded by the bad reviews of this movie online and so I decided to not go and see this film in the cinema. However, I was pleased to find that they were playing it on the airplane on my way to from Chicago so I watched it absolutely free then.

This film questions what many have before. Who wrote all the masses and masses of works credited to one William Shakespeare? This film is set within the political atmosphere of the Elizabethan Court and Lord Oxford is presented as the true author of the many works of ‘William Shakespeare’. Being a Lord, writing plays wasn’t something he was able to share with the world and so he paid an actor to pretend to write his plays in order to get them onto the stage of the famous Globe Theatre. At the same time De Vere, or Lord Oxford, has a love affair with the Queen and with her, he sires a child. This is something that turns out to be incredibly important nearer the end of the film through one of the most shocking plot twists I’ve ever seen.

Anonymous is defined as a political thriller and a pseudo-historical drama film. I’ve always been a big fan of fictionalised history because when a story is loosely based on true events  it’s usually a lot more believable. This was true, to some extent, for Anonymous; however, I felt that as the film progressed it became less and less believable. The people who don’t have much historical knowledge on the subject, will probably think this film was absolutely bonkers. That said, they did some pretty strange things back in the day so I wouldn’t be that surprised if these events had actually happened. I’m no expert on Shakespearian history, but the general atmosphere of the film seemed to tie in with the way of life back then.

I have to admit that the plot was not at all easy to follow and I found some scenes thoroughly confusing. There were quite a lot of scene changes in which they showed snippets from the past which involved different actors playing the younger versions of the characters and I found it a little hard to keep up with who was who. Adding to the confusion was the fact that this film was a play within a play within a play. If you can wrap your head around this, then it is rather a nice touch; however, if you get left behind, you’ll probably never catch up.

On the other hand, the cast was made up of a number of brilliant actors including Jamie Campbell Bower, Rhys Ifans, Vanessa Redgrave, Sebastian Armesto, Rafe Spall, David Thewlis, Sir Derek Jacobi, Xavier Samuel and many more. It is a little hard to judge the actors on their merits given that the plot was all over the place but I believe the actors did a good job of translating the script to screen. I do not think it was the acting that brought this film down for critics, but rather the plot line. There was some really solid acting from Rhys Ifans, Vanessa Redgrave and Jamie Campbell Bower who really embodied their seventeenth century characters.

The best thing for me about this film was the costume and scenery. There were some absolutely magnificent and scenic views of ‘Old’ England so I suppose that’s a huge thumbs up to the location scouter. In addition, the makeup, the costumes and the set were fantastic and looked very authentic adding to the credibility of this film. However, I did not like the character Shakespeare at all. Whilst the point of this movie was to show Shakespeare as a fraud, I didn’t feel that the representation of his character was accurate or believable at all. Shakespeare even crowd surfed at one point. This is by no means a criticism of the actor, but of the way that the character Shakespeare was written in the script. His character is obnoxious and I just cannot believe that the great Shakespeare could actually have been a power-hungry actor. Again, I suppose this was the point.

All in all, this movie isn’t that bad. Whilst the plot was confusing at times, there was some brilliant acting and the effect of the visual was magnificent. This is definitely a film for English or history nerds, though this film is truly mind boggling at times so I wouldn’t recommend this for those who like light hearted and simple films. If you are an English nerd, prepare for your dreams of what William Shakespeare was like to be shattered. You will probably find yourself a little angry that the producers even considered making a movie about a fraudulent Shakespeare. However, it is interesting to know what conspiracy theories there are surrounding the world’s greatest writer.

If you liked this post, check out these:

Film Review: Source Code
Film Review: Inception
Find more film reviews on What’s Hot? here. 

Stay up to date with What’s Hot?

Bloglovin’ / Instagram / Facebook / Twitter / Pinterest

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Looking for Something?